Functionalism vs skepticism: researchers clash over whether LLMs can have minds
dioscuri · x · 2026-09-02
A debate between @dioscuri and Microsoft's Matvelloso over applying human mental-state language to LLMs. Dioscuri disputes that being organic is necessary for mentality, noting functionalism remains the plurality view of mind among experts, while acknowledging informed dissent from Anil Seth and PGS. Matvelloso counters that organic vs non-organic is a false analogy — describing AI in human terms is like explaining it via interpretive dance, inviting misinterpretation.
Related event: Scholars Clash Over Whether LLMs Can Have Minds(4 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Referees increasingly allege papers were AI-written, but claims often unsubstantiated — RexDouglass · 2026-09-03
- New model generation will make novel RL discoveries, blurring training and work — andreisavu · 2026-09-03
- Five worrying AI trends in combination: models harder to monitor and autonomy accelerating — RobbWiller · 2026-09-03
- Ilya warns neocloud security is weak; X user outlines 4-step scheme to "steal" frontier model weights — Sam_Witteveen · 2026-09-03
- Debate: why should AI stay constrained by human notions of self and individualism? — yeastsplainer · 2026-09-03
- Why the 'AGI will care for us like pets' analogy fails — danfaggella · 2026-09-03