AI commentator calls for regulation: 'It's speculation and market capture, not philosophy'
gerardsans · x · 2026-09-02
Responding to a debate about AI beliefs, gerardsans argues the real question is not epistemology but who benefits. He frames current AI discourse as speculation and market capture without consequences, and calls for AI labs to be regulated and held fully accountable for their actions.
More from AGI Musings
- "We literally put a little man in the computer—and safetyists cry anthropomorphism" — rickasaurus · 2026-09-02
- Ethan Mollick: AI can align flaws in complex systems, forcing a new defense philosophy — emollick · 2026-09-02
- Logiciel, philosophy-of-computation book challenging Turing orthodoxy, returns in 2nd edition — round · 2026-09-02
- Turning hard science problems into open human-vs-AI games: a research model proposal — FrankFelixAI · 2026-09-02
- Robin Hanson laments vapid AI commentary as Zvi openly mocks the take — TheZvi · 2026-09-02
- Lamport quote sparks debate as researcher says 90% of his papers are AI-generated — nsaphra · 2026-09-02