Researcher praises ACL review cycle: rejected papers can resubmit with documented revisions
3scorciav · x · 2026-09-02
A researcher highlights an appreciated feature of ACL Rolling Review: a rejected paper can move to another review cycle, provided all reviewer comments were addressed and a draft explains what changed. The author argues this matters as mainstream ML submission volumes keep growing.
More from Research
- Humanity's First Interstellar Spacecraft to Alpha Centauri Sparks Buzz — rand_longevity · 2026-09-02
- KV Cache as an Information Bottleneck Between Tokens: Austin Huang's Idea — austinvhuang · 2026-09-02
- H3-World turns MiniMax H3 into a controllable world simulator with 8k gameplay samples — sachasayan · 2026-09-02
- Nature Comms Perspective links explainable AI, foundation models and scientific discovery — ricardovinuesa · 2026-09-02
- Looped transformer is no dark art: rasbt debunks the OpenAI Astra rumor — rasbt · 2026-09-02
- A decade of robot skill learning: from mass imitation to few-shot RL — stepjamUK · 2026-09-02