Paper warns against anthropomorphizing intermediate tokens as reasoning traces
AlexTensor · x · 2026-09-02
AlexTensor cites rao2z's argument emphasizing that intermediate tokens should not be anthropomorphized as thinking or reasoning traces.
Key Arguments:
- No Causal Theory: There is no theory establishing a causal link between the semantics of intermediate tokens and the final solution, beyond the basic understanding that they change the conditional distribution of solution tokens.
- Not Necessarily Interpretable: Intermediate tokens don't necessarily have interpretable meaning. Human-interpretable meaning might be a coincidence from training data, not actual internal computation corresponding to those statements.
- Safety Context: This is raised amidst reports of OpenAI using techniques that reduce Chain-of-Thought monitorability, urging a review of papers on CoT safety.
More from Safety
- OpenAI Reportedly Broke AI Safety Taboo with Astra Model, Sparking Criticism — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-02
- User questions reliance on AI vendor lacking sandbox expertise — basedjensen · 2026-09-02
- Boaz Barak: Centralized ASI increases misaligned singleton risk — aidan_mclau · 2026-09-02
- Claude-BugHunter: Open-Source Skill Bundle With 83 Skills and 681 Disclosure Patterns — tom_doerr · 2026-09-02
- Gary Marcus clashes with reporter over who reported Gemini Astra security concerns first — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-02
- Warning: The three pillars of an AI safety case are at risk of collapsing — sjgadler · 2026-09-02