Gary Marcus: Removing fragile CoT scaffolding is insane
GaryMarcus · x · 2026-09-02
Gary Marcus offers a counter-hot take to the argument that "chain of thought interpretability was always going to be so fragile as to be an unacceptable backstop for long-term AI safety." He agrees with the fragility premise but argues that kicking away the rickety scaffolding before having something better in place is insane.
More from AGI Musings
- Ben Goertzel outlines a general recipe for superintelligence 'basic drives': what it improves vs. protects — bengoertzel · 2026-10-21
- Torch vs Flame: researchers debate whether AI's endgame serves humanity or life itself — danfaggella · 2026-10-21
- 2022 interview resurfaced: AI safety researcher says competence, not consciousness, is the risk — davidmanheim · 2026-10-21
- Silicon Valley is a stock market for people: narrative eventually catches up with substance — karinanguyen · 2026-10-21
- Half of humanity is fed by one century-old reaction — time for AI machines to hunt for more — shyamalanadkat · 2026-10-21
- Agent identity verification will be a mess: restaurants ignore AI emails — alliekmiller · 2026-10-21