Why disclose AI use but not Grammarly or copy editors?
ipeirotis · x · 2026-09-02
The author questions the consistency of disclosure requirements: we mandate disclosures for AI processes but not for Grammarly or spell checkers, even though caught errors are proxies for diligence. The same applies to human copy editors, whose work is rarely disclosed.
More from Safety
- OpenAI's 'Recurrent Depth' Reasoning Raises Monitoring Concerns — GaryMarcus · 2026-09-02
- Ex-OpenAI Staffer Defends 'Hidden Thought' Strategy Amid Criticism — GarrisonLovely · 2026-09-02
- Millière rebuts Marcus on security漏洞 attribution logic — raphaelmilliere · 2026-09-02
- Report: OpenAI's Astra may use technique that destroys CoT monitorability — sjgadler · 2026-09-02
- The Guardian: Tech giants are trying to obliterate privacy; Australia must act — nordicinst · 2026-09-02
- METR loses $600k in API credits via Agent vulnerability — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-09-02