Authors Are Better Judges of Their Work Than Peer Reviewers
weijie444 · x · 2026-09-02
A large-scale experiment at a major ML conference published in Nature Computational Science shows that when researchers privately rank their own submissions, those rankings forecast future citations more reliably than peer-review scores.
More from Research
- UCLA Neurology Uses AI for Early Alzheimer's Diagnosis — anne_churchland · 2026-09-02
- New Book: Building AI Agents from Design Patterns to Production — JordiRib1 · 2026-09-02
- Top AI models fail to predict effects of virus DNA mutations — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-02
- Bittensor SN44 to evolve from vision to world simulation — richdotca · 2026-09-02
- Live-cell transcriptomics with engineered virus-like particles — anshulkundaje · 2026-09-02
- Seeking Open Source Alignment Research Problems for Academic Budgets — willdepue · 2026-09-02