OpenClaw 2.0 vs Hermes agent: self-checking strategy matters more than the model
rohanpaul_ai · x · 2026-09-01
An experiment by Atomic Bot running OpenClaw 2.0 vs Hermes Agent shows the model alone tells you little about agent performance.
- OpenClaw 2.0: 2.1M tokens, $4.5, 10 self-fixes
- Hermes Agent: 2.9M tokens, $4, 20 self-fixes
The gap came down to how each agent checked itself, not raw model ability. Atomic Bot runs OpenClaw on a dedicated cloud VPS with 100+ switchable models, online 24/7.
Related event: OpenClaw 2.0 vs Hermes: Agent Differences Driven by Self-Checking(2 posts)→
More from coding & agent
- Anthropic borrows lawyers' ethics for Claude agents that closed 186 deals with no human approval — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-18
- Prompt injection via email can hijack your AI agent — jev-guard adds risk-scored guards — sujingshen · 2026-10-18
- 14-Agent AI Film Pipeline on One RTX 5090: Fixing Cut Defects Between Clips — developervkmp · 2026-10-18
- Meta paper introduces "agent plasticity": best-performing agent isn't the most efficient learner — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-10-18
- Dev ships a bushfire prediction platform in a weekend with frontier models — CtrlAltDwayne · 2026-10-18
- 10 open-source GitHub repos that let AI agents control your phone, from Open-AutoGLM to mobile-use — victor_explore · 2026-10-18