Critique of "API Science": obscuring the true nature of LLMs
voooooogel · x · 2026-09-01
A user criticizes the trend of 'API science' in AI research, arguing that researchers wrongly reify meaningless API affordances as real features of the language model. This approach lacks rigor and rots the field by distracting from understanding what is actually happening inside the model.
More from Research
- Interpretability debate: one interpretable polysemantic neuron doesn't prove all are — aran_nayebi · 2026-10-16
- Optuna creator Akiba: when 2 hyperparameters cost $20M, what's left for BO/HPO — Stefania_druga · 2026-10-16
- AI will be superhuman at science regardless, and Europe can't opt out — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-16
- SERO augments long-horizon agentic RL with executable oracle continuations — Shanghai-AI-Laboratory · 2026-10-16
- Tsinghua and Amap propose OmniVerifier-C1, a graded verifier beating binary judges — Bowei Liu · 2026-10-16
- Alibaba open-sources MAI-Gym, an all-in-one GUI agent eval and RL training platform — Tongyi-MAI · 2026-10-16