Barron talk Part 2: which research areas should and shouldn't care about explicit 3D representations
jon_barron · x · 2026-08-31
Part 2 of Jon Barron's talk presents his current sense of which research areas probably should — and maybe shouldn't — care about using explicit 3D representations, with an overview diagram. The rest of the talk is a deeper dive into each research area to examine where explicit 3D actually earns its keep.
Related event: Jon Barron Releases CVPR Talk Questioning Explicit 3D Representations(10 posts)→
More from Research
- A beginner-friendly introduction to causal inference kicks off, Part 1 — Nasereliver · 2026-10-16
- FBI method trains for Pass@K with one sample per update at 12.3% of the cost — EmtiyazKhan · 2026-10-16
- Berkeley researchers sample humanoid robot policies directly from weight space with diffusion — berkeley_ai · 2026-10-16
- OneWM: unified causal training shows world and action modeling improve each other — IAAI233 · 2026-10-16
- Baidu's Virtual Head Attention tames the KV cache, FLOPs, quality triangle in long-context LLMs — baidu · 2026-10-16
- 5.8M-param Speech Event Detector adds laughs, breaths and背景 sounds to Whisper transcripts — Ayush Kumar Bar · 2026-10-16