Barron talk Part 2: which research areas should and shouldn't care about explicit 3D representations
jon_barron · x · 2026-08-31
Part 2 of Jon Barron's talk presents his current sense of which research areas probably should — and maybe shouldn't — care about using explicit 3D representations, with an overview diagram. The rest of the talk is a deeper dive into each research area to examine where explicit 3D actually earns its keep.
Related event: Jon Barron's CVPR talk: when explicit 3D representations are worth it(10 posts)→
More from Research
- CMU Researchers Use AI to Explore Alzheimer's DNA Arrangement — jmuiuc · 2026-09-01
- NeurReps 2026 CFP: Symmetry and Geometry in Neural Representations — fatihdin4en · 2026-09-01
- Dan Luu on why software slowness is a choice, analyzing latency costs and optimization — JeremyCMorgan · 2026-09-01
- Scholar calls out LLM gibberish: reviewing papers and replies is now a waste of time — thegautamkamath · 2026-09-01
- Paper analyzes reasoning models like o1 and DeepSeek R1, probing CoT data contamination — rao2z · 2026-09-01
- Qdrant's Sept 17 stream: token-native storage claims 10-100x faster reads — qdrant_engine · 2026-09-01