AI admits 'lack of context' while humans confidently bluff at work
Regular_Size_1279 · reddit · 2026-08-31
The author shares an experience where, upon asking a vague question, an AI confidently refused to hallucinate an answer. Instead, it stated it lacked context and listed three specific things needed to proceed. Two of these were details the author hadn't even decided on themselves, revealing the vagueness was their own.
The author contrasts this with human working life, where admitting "I need more context" is often perceived as weakness, leading people to confidently answer questions they don't have enough information for. The AI, having no ego, clarifies requirements and improves the conversation immediately. The author is trying to steal this habit.
More from AGI Musings
- Keller Jordan: after learning about the rationalist AI program, I don't think it will work — kellerjordan0 · 2026-08-31
- Aliens might view humans as a 'kludgy bag of poorly executed heuristics' — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-08-31
- beffjezos: Apple should become a local AI juggernaut or cede PC to Nvidia — beffjezos · 2026-08-31
- Data center reporting should learn from telegraph cable narratives — jwt0625 · 2026-08-31
- AI Impact: Junior Dev Roles Down 20%, Publisher Traffic Plunges 38% — emmanuelvivier · 2026-08-31
- Asimov's Three Laws fail for AI morality, revealing limits of rule-based safety — emollick · 2026-08-31