Users Complain Qwen 3.8 Outputs Are Dense and Hard to Read
parepeg · reddit · 2026-08-31
A user complains that Qwen 3.8 (27B and Flash Next) outputs are difficult to read, citing examples like using set intersection symbols instead of plain English and odd word choices like 'persona'. The author attributes this to an effort to minimize 'tokens per intelligence', which sacrifices human readability, and expresses concern that Qwen is following the same path as Claude 5 in becoming less readable.
More from Models
- Same debate, with chart: can harnesses sustain AI progress past the plateau? — Otherwise-Report1848 · 2026-10-16
- Mistral touts STEM benchmark win, but leaderboard shows it ranking sixth overall — MistralAI · 2026-10-16
- Local tool calling compared: how Gemma 4, Llama 3 and Mistral differ — leslysandra · 2026-10-16
- $2 Gemini Pro accounts flood the gray market, spawning waves of AI spam comments — huangyun_122 · 2026-10-16
- Haider: Opus 5.5 vs Astra on SWE tasks — Astra has a higher floor, reasoning in a tier of its own — haider1 · 2026-10-16
- Artificial Analysis launches Decision Index for the emerging decision model category — ArtificialAnlys · 2026-10-16