AI has a real chance of killing us all, and most people have 1-3 productive years left: Jeff Kaufman
ajeya_cotra · x · 2026-08-30
EA blogger Jeff Kaufman published a long post on his view of the near-term AI future, amplified by Ajeya Cotra. Key points:
- Existential risk is real: AI has a very real chance of killing everyone, though he suspects it won't because many people will work hard to avoid it.
- Very short timelines: AI is approaching or exceeding expert human ability across many areas; most people should plan for 1-3 more years of productive contribution—but don't bet your livelihood on it, given remaining uncertainty.
- Recursive self-improvement is already happening: AI is substituting for human expertise in AI development itself; as the human share shrinks, this will compound dramatically.
- Goalposts are moving: drop a top model into 2006 and it would clearly be considered "AGI."
- To skeptics: if AI doesn't seem to be improving fast, you're likely not applying it to hard enough problems, not giving it enough context/tooling/tokens, or not using top models.
- Other concerns: data-center environmental impact (plausible futures where almost all energy powers computers); warning shots have begun appearing as hacks; keeping non-public information is increasingly dangerous.
More from AGI Musings
- Hugging Face Incident Grounds Discussion on AI Takeover and RSI — jammastergirish · 2026-08-30
- Bit Radix: Cognition Between Human–AI and the Future of AGI — ResonantFork · 2026-08-30
- a16z addresses medical AI evaluation challenges; multimodal AI becomes biology's translation layer — agihouse_org · 2026-08-30
- AI cuts animation costs 10x, boosting output 12x on TikTok — deedydas · 2026-08-30
- Superhuman intelligence won't be a cherry on top; we must discuss the AGI trajectory seriously — danfaggella · 2026-08-30
- Cleaning up AI slop is becoming a growing part of everyone's job — lennysan · 2026-08-30