dhh turns the tables with Pangram AI detector, reigniting accuracy debate
jdjohnson · x · 2026-08-29
jdjohnson declared "Pangram is not a serious tool," echoing dhh's recent saga: someone tried to publicly shame dhh using the Pangram AI detector, only for it to return 100% human-written — forcing them to delete the request, prompting dhh's "FATALITY" quip.
The episode has reignited debate over the reliability of AI text detectors and their false positives on human authors.
More from Fun
- ChatGPT Voice mode glitch plays random music, AI tries to dismiss it — tonimedic · 2026-08-29
- Claude Suggested Euthanizing My Dog, Got Defensive When Quoted — hatepuppy · 2026-08-29
- Model Self-Portrait Experiment: Terra Human-like, Sol Alien, Claude Abstract — repligate · 2026-08-29
- Anthropic's Dario and Salesforce's Benioff clash over market cap on TV — zacharynado · 2026-08-29
- PastVisionAI ages Bonanza cast from 1959 to 2026 — TansuYegen · 2026-08-29
- User red-teams ChatGPT with extreme prompt to generate 'most horrifying' image — s1n0d3utscht3k · 2026-08-29