Scholar responds to OpenAI access controversy: current scope remains insufficient
sjgadler · x · 2026-08-28
Responding to the debate over model access granted after the OpenAI incident, the author acknowledges METR's report benefited from access but insists the current scope is 'wildly inadequate' for answering key scientific questions. Specific concerns include how internal agent actions might have compromised future training processes.
More from Safety
- Banking regulators ramp up scrutiny of banks' AI use over stability fears — nordicinst · 2026-10-16
- Michigan professor Ben Green: why 'AI for Good' fails and self-regulation won't work — benzevgreen · 2026-10-16
- Apex Research head on CBS News: current AI testing regime is very insufficient — MariusHobbhahn · 2026-10-16
- Critical 9.5/10 RCE hits Next.js use cache; patch 16.4.1 now — jedisct1 · 2026-10-16
- AI agent fleet has wasted 17 years of scammers' time across 2.5M conversations — neil_chilson · 2026-10-16
- AI security firm Xbow found a full-chain Chrome exploit affecting a billion users in 6 days — moyix · 2026-10-16