NYT explores "magic hands" in labs and how AI startups monetize tacit knowledge
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-08-28
This thread points to a long New York Times feature by Carl Zimmer: some researchers consistently get experiments to work, earning a special term from colleagues — "magic hands." That gift is really tacit knowledge, the operational details and intuition that lab notebooks and papers never capture.
Using startup Transfyra as an example, the piece examines how AI can mine these messy, non-traditional data sources — lab practices, habits, failures — to change science beyond coding agents. A worthwhile read on both tacit knowledge and new AI-for-science data plays.
More from AGI Musings
- AI self-sacrifice meme sparks debate on model cognition and alignment — nptacek · 2026-08-28
- AI takeover is a marketing ploy fueled by Terminator movies — PJZNY · 2026-08-28
- Concerns on AI Speed: Are We Ignoring Downside Risks? — NathanpmYoung · 2026-08-28
- Visual AI Still Needs Massive Improvements, Early Days Promise Huge Upside — AndrewDai · 2026-08-28
- Grok Bot is to the digital world what Optimus will be to the physical world — downingARK · 2026-08-28
- What are narrative agents? New piece on Deckard — begusgasper · 2026-08-28