Analysis compares Qwen and MiniMax sparse attention implementations
stochasticchasm · x · 2026-08-28
A technical observer noted that Qwen's sparse attention appears to be a refined version of MiniMax's sparse attention. Both are block sparse, with the key difference being that Qwen performs pooling before SDPA (Scaled Dot-Product Attention), whereas MiniMax does so after. This pre-SDPA pooling design significantly reduces computation costs for long contexts. The post includes a link to the arXiv paper on MiniMax Sparse Attention.
Related event: Qwen vs MiniMax Sparse Attention Compared as New TileLang Kernels Drop(6 posts)→
More from Research
- GUI-Primitives Benchmark Reveals VLM Spatial Reasoning Failures — usc-isi · 2026-08-28
- Factory releases ProgramBench: A benchmark for reproducing real software from scratch — matanSF · 2026-08-28
- Ablation discussion: query head count barely matters early, sparse routing must be learned — stochasticchasm · 2026-08-28
- 404 Team to Walkthrough Titan Model and World Models — markjeffrey · 2026-08-28
- NVIDIA Details QAD Pipeline for Optimizing Nemotron Model — PyTorch · 2026-08-28
- Study: AI Coding Agents Are Reshaping PR Vocabulary — ycombinator · 2026-08-28