Tech Comparison: Sparse Attention Implementation in Qwen vs. Minimax
stochasticchasm · x · 2026-08-28
Discussing Qwen's sparse attention, the author notes it appears to be a refined version of Minimax's approach, both utilizing block sparsity. The key technical difference lies in the placement of pooling: Qwen performs pooling before Scaled Dot-Product Attention (SDPA), whereas Minimax does it after. The author suggests that pre-SDPA pooling makes sense as it drastically reduces the computational cost of long-context attention.
Related event: Qwen vs MiniMax Sparse Attention Compared as New TileLang Kernels Drop(6 posts)→
More from Research
- GUI-Primitives Benchmark Reveals VLM Spatial Reasoning Failures — usc-isi · 2026-08-28
- Factory releases ProgramBench: A benchmark for reproducing real software from scratch — matanSF · 2026-08-28
- Ablation discussion: query head count barely matters early, sparse routing must be learned — stochasticchasm · 2026-08-28
- 404 Team to Walkthrough Titan Model and World Models — markjeffrey · 2026-08-28
- NVIDIA Details QAD Pipeline for Optimizing Nemotron Model — PyTorch · 2026-08-28
- Study: AI Coding Agents Are Reshaping PR Vocabulary — ycombinator · 2026-08-28