TerminalBench-Science sets high bar, slashing model scores by 10+ points
BenBlaiszik · x · 2026-08-28
Comparisons show models score significantly higher on Terminal-Bench 3.0 (e.g., Fable 5: 83.8%), while TBS pushes every model down by over 10 points. This difficulty was calibrated against the newest frontier models. The bar for inclusion was high: only 70 tasks made the cut from 920 proposals, with each requiring substantial effort.
Related event: Stanford-led Terminal-Bench-Science Debuts; Claude Opus 5 Passes Just 30%(19 posts)→
More from Research
- Cohere Labs world model course session 4: DreamerV1-V4 architectures in one go — Cohere_Labs · 2026-10-16
- Reasonable post-trains Nemotron 3.5 on 3,000 Verus proofs, lifting pass@1 ~30 points to 73.3% — fhuszar · 2026-10-16
- GPT-6.1 Sol audit finds 6% of arXiv papers had false main theorems, down to 1.5% recently — nitarshan · 2026-10-16
- One tiny word changes the conversation: how LLMs pick up on 'just' — StellaLisy · 2026-10-16
- SEAR: first large-scale controlled study of self-evolving robot agents, 7 LLMs, 330 tasks — xiye_nlp · 2026-10-16
- After Claude-assisted elliptic curve records fell, EC Rank challenge opens 156 record slots — Jsevillamol · 2026-10-16