Test: WAN 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5, Difference Smaller Than Expected
hey_abusiddik · x · 2026-08-26
A side-by-side test using the same prompt reveals that the visual difference between WAN 3.0 and Seedance 2.5 is smaller than expected. The reviewer notes that future evaluation will focus on motion, consistency, and generation cost. WAN 3.0 is now live on DeeVid AI, featuring lower generation costs, stronger motion, and richer details.
More from Multimodal
- Halcyon early-fusion image models match late-fusion with 275x less pretraining compute, open-sourced — davidwromero · 2026-10-16
- Running Wan2.1 14B FP16 on a 12GB laptop GPU: VRAM swap stress test finishes in 4m11s — RYuu-1120 · 2026-10-16
- Striking Midjourney generations: black holes and planetary aesthetics — ciguleva · 2026-10-16
- Fable 5.5 may drop today as Andrew Curran hints at early release — kimmonismus · 2026-10-16
- Kling 4.0 Adds Timeline Editing, Endorsed by 'Seoul Spring' Director Kim Seong-su — xiaohu · 2026-10-16
- One prompt, no reference images: Argon builds 3D Gaussian splats from geometry equations in NumPy — fofrAI · 2026-10-16