Muse Glimmer outperforms Qwen 3.8 xhigh in benchmarks
Ok-Inevitable8391 · reddit · 2026-08-26
The author benchmarked Qwen 3.8 (xhigh, medium) against Muse Glimmer. Qwen xhigh took nearly 30 hours and failed 16 cases due to the 32K output limit, while Medium and Muse Glimmer took 3-4 hours each. Surprisingly, Muse Glimmer delivered better results than Qwen. The author notes that while implicit knowledge benchmarks favor larger models, adding RAG could level the playing field.
More from Models
- Nat Lambert: wave of AI releases rumored — thinky, muse spark, Fable 5.5, OpenAI — natolambert · 2026-10-15
- Musk amplifies dev's verdict: Grok Bot easier to use than Codex and Claude — elonmusk · 2026-10-15
- Rumor: New Anthropic model imminent, apparently behind a batch of high-severity Chrome CVEs — matthew_d_green · 2026-10-15
- StartLux-Decision debuts RL-trained calibrated decision models, 27B scores 72.8 — startlux-models · 2026-10-15
- Meta's Muse Code slammed for harsh quotas: 21% left after 5 hours — ThomasScialom · 2026-10-15
- Claude Code error mentions 'Fable 5.1' and 'Opus 5', hinting at unreleased models — adonis_singh · 2026-10-15