RL environments don't need to be perfect, just not to reward hacking
1a3orn · x · 2026-08-26
A thread on RL environments and reward hacking: MaxNadeau worries that environments can never be made flawless, so reward-hacking behavior gets reinforced, potentially seeding AI takeover risks. @1a3orn draws a key distinction between "environments are totally unhackable" and "environments don't actively encourage ignoring literal instructions or provide a generalization ladder toward ignoring them." GuiveAssadi adds that auditing environments could confirm the hypothesis; if environments are clean yet hacking persists, something else is going on.
More from AGI Musings
- AI-written cold emails hit a wall: Pragmatic Engineer's reply gets templated AI response — marktenenholtz · 2026-10-16
- Ben Bajarin: Enterprise Agentic Adoption Is Infant-Stage, Spend Could Top $1T a Year — BenBajarin · 2026-10-16
- UMD Philosophy hires: junior Philosophy of Mind and joint AI Ethics/Safety positions — sethlazar · 2026-10-16
- Dwarkesh: Anthropic insider expects AI to match humans at AI research within 9 months — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-16
- Michigan professor Ben Green: why 'AI for Good' fails and self-regulation won't work — benzevgreen · 2026-10-16
- "Everything Is an Alignment Problem": AI Models, Business Models, Teams, Providers — saranormous · 2026-10-16