Study Shows Pangram AI Detector Has Near-Zero False Positive Rate for Human Writing
ivan_bezdomny · x · 2026-08-26
Addressing doubts about AI detectors, Hossein cites a University of Chicago study indicating Pangram's false positive rate is negligible. If Pangram flags text as AI-written, it almost certainly is; false negatives are far more likely than false positives. The author adds that while AIs try to bypass it with short text or recipes, Pangram remains an excellent proxy.
More from Models
- Skild releases S1, a robot foundation model that learns tasks from video demos — deepakpathak · 2026-08-26
- Qwen 3.8 Max released: 27B open weights runnable on high-end laptops — jwilson02 · 2026-08-26
- User reports incredibly dumb refusals from Fable model — generativist · 2026-08-26
- Grok 4.6 is 2.5x faster than Luna, becoming the default daily model — PawelHuryn · 2026-08-26
- China vs US Model Prices: Chinese Models Cheaper at Low End, US Wins at High End — scaling01 · 2026-08-26
- GLM-5.3 Benchmark: Fixes 19 Bugs vs Grok 4.7's 27, Slower Speed — PawelHuryn · 2026-08-26