LLM use is like MCMC: reward-seeking prompts that never backtrack
rickasaurus · x · 2026-08-25
@TricklerHQ argues that current LLMs and how we use them resemble a reward-seeking stochastic process, like MCMC—each incremental prompt climbs toward a higher energy state without ever backtracking. A reply pushes back: if models were that dumb they couldn't handle long-running tasks, and argues LLMs will always need a harness providing "sense organs" and capabilities; all the nudging and rewriting just reflects that models are still bad.
More from Models
- Unverified: internal snapshot labeled gpt-6-astra-api-priv-ev3 spotted on model tracker — lyraxana · 2026-10-16
- NVIDIA releases Nemotron 3.5 Bolt 74B MoE that fits in 24GB VRAM at 2-bit — NerdyRodent · 2026-10-16
- Muse Code 1.4.8 cuts token usage; all user quotas reset immediately — alexandr_wang · 2026-10-16
- Alibaba and Baidu to power key parts of Apple's AI services in China — nordicinst · 2026-10-16
- Cornell and Amazon revisit the 16x pretraining compute gap: diffusion LMs need only 3-8x — LucaAmb · 2026-10-16
- Image Decision Benchmark JevImageBench hits v0.3.0 with reshuffled Top 5 — airesearch12 · 2026-10-16