Study analyzes AI disclosure statements in 13k+ papers, finds disconnect
danish037 · x · 2026-08-25
An analysis of 13,867 disclosure statements from EMNLP 2025 and ICLR 2026 reveals a significant disconnect between expectations and practice. Issues include frequent disclosure of writing assistance. The authors propose protocols for compulsory vs. optional disclosures and a boilerplate template.
More from Safety
- Veracode: AI now writes ~half of committed code, but security pass rate stuck at 56% — WeldPond · 2026-10-16
- Anthropic red team's first-ever model "abliteration" cut GLM-5.3 refusals from 90% to 3% for ~$4,400 — cephaloform · 2026-10-16
- Anthropic grants METR employee-like access as independent safety evaluators go public — AnthropicAI · 2026-10-16
- APEX-Harm benchmark: script-based injection attacks easily compromise agents in shared workspaces — KAUST · 2026-10-16
- Residual-stream forecasts predict agent violations before they happen, USC study shows — USC · 2026-10-16
- Blogger doubles down: Anthropic's Scion image model accused of ripping off Mononoke — sunshowers · 2026-10-16