Discussion: Defining superintelligence goals is underdefined and possibly incoherent
repligate · x · 2026-08-25
A discussion argues that it is extremely underdefined and possibly incoherent to talk about what a superintelligence would pursue. It critiques simplistic models of AI minds like Claude, suggesting they should be viewed as flawed psychologies similar to humans.
More from AGI Musings
- Why data companies are printing money: labs pay millions for env-shaped nails — sarahookr · 2026-10-15
- Chollet backs Gakku: conversational AI as the biggest education leap of our generation — fchollet · 2026-10-15
- Subbarao Kambhampati to dissect the 'mythos of LLM thinking tokens' at UMN — rao2z · 2026-10-15
- Pure-play AI firms' combined revenue — $500B or $1T — will decide if AGI takes off this decade — Jsevillamol · 2026-10-15
- AI 2027 timeline gains believers: 2027 likely the most critical year for capability jumps — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-15
- Inside SAIF: a16z's $25M bet on AI rewriting the economics of cyber defense for small towns — a16z · 2026-10-15