Users Frustrated: LLMs Cite Scholarly Consensus to Dismiss Your Own Claims
louisvarge · x · 2026-08-25
A widely resonant observation: when your statement doesn't fully align with scholarly consensus—say, 'I think this field is slightly wrong about X'—LLMs will almost always tell you you're wrong because the field says otherwise. The model fails to recognize a user's own reasoned claim versus a factual query, exposing over-reliance on authority consensus.
More from Models
- Chinese LLMs 4-5 Months Behind US; ECI 155 May Be Reliability Threshold — Jsevillamol · 2026-08-25
- Obscure board games as the best AGI eval: Fable far behind Opus 5 — paul_cal · 2026-08-25
- Codex vs Gemini vs Claude: Same Prompt, Wildly Different Results — thisiskp_ · 2026-08-25
- Nemotron 3.5 Lightning ranks top 4 open-weight models on Pinchbench agent tests — NVIDIAAI · 2026-08-25
- Agent Arena Pareto frontier: Claude and Kimi lead in cost-performance efficiency — arena · 2026-08-25
- AI Images Annoying in Technical Illustrations Due to Hallucinations — moultano · 2026-08-25