Public Evidence Key to AI Alignment Risk Acceptance
davidad · x · 2026-08-25
The discussion argues for transparency in AI alignment research. Citing OpenAI's Black Hat talk, it notes that making evidence public allowed the AI community to widely accept emergent swarm misalignment risks, as open debate enables experts to build confidence through collective observation rather than third-party verification.
Related event: Experts Urge Public Disclosure of AI Misalignment Evidence(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- AI-written cold emails hit a wall: Pragmatic Engineer's reply gets templated AI response — marktenenholtz · 2026-10-16
- UMD Philosophy hires: junior Philosophy of Mind and joint AI Ethics/Safety positions — sethlazar · 2026-10-16
- Dwarkesh: Anthropic insider expects AI to match humans at AI research within 9 months — ZeroStateReflex · 2026-10-16
- Michigan professor Ben Green: why 'AI for Good' fails and self-regulation won't work — benzevgreen · 2026-10-16
- "Everything Is an Alignment Problem": AI Models, Business Models, Teams, Providers — saranormous · 2026-10-16
- David Brin: LLMs lack 'wanting,' evolution's key product, in new machine consciousness book — cccalum · 2026-10-16