User Slams Opus 5 as a Regression, Claims More Errors Than Sonnet 4
paradite_ · x · 2026-08-23
User paradite heavily criticized Anthropic's Opus 5 model, labeling it a regression. They claimed it makes more mistakes than Sonnet 4 and is fundamentally a bad model, dismissing any counterarguments based on follower count or affiliation.
Related event: Users Report Widespread Regression in Anthropic's Opus 5 and Sonnet 5(8 posts)→
More from Models
- Meta open-sources Muse Spark Open: 816B-parameter model that runs locally on two Mac Studios — gabriberton · 2026-10-16
- Grok Voice 3.0 Tops Design Arena Speech Leaderboard, Up 7.4 Points — XFreeze · 2026-10-16
- Robotics LLMs tested on 16 tasks: GPT-6 Astra hits 17.2% success vs Fable's 9.1% — pabbeel · 2026-10-16
- Meta open-sources Muse Spark: top US open model, scores just below DeepSeek — bindureddy · 2026-10-16
- TRL adds day-0 support for fine-tuning Muse Spark Open's 816B MoE with LoRA on 64 H100s — QGallouedec · 2026-10-16
- Meta's Muse Spark Open ships detailed eval docs; researcher pushes machine-readable EEE standard — evijit · 2026-10-16