The causal chain: blocking AI compute costs lives, datacenters don't
flowersslop · x · 2026-08-23
A widely-shared argument: suppose OpenAI or Anthropic cures cancer in 1–3 years — realistic, the author claims, but only with enough compute. Then stopping that compute means people who would have lived will die; whereas even if the datacenter buildout fails, nobody dies from datacenters. The author frames this as the literal causal chain. It's a canonical e/acc-style rebuttal to datacenter environmental/community objections, resting on a heavily contested premise.
Related event: Debate over whether blocking compute costs lives(2 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Gemini Self-Assessment: Current AI Path is a 'Net Negative' for Humanity — miguellan · 2026-08-23
- PreziGPT is here, but why you should still build your own slides — CSProfKGD · 2026-08-23
- US compute dominance threatened by deindustrialization and energy stagnation — beffjezos · 2026-08-23
- iamtrask critiques utilitarianism's overconfidence in world models — iamtrask · 2026-08-23
- Aligning AI is 'rearranging deck chairs on the Titanic' if AGI is 2-3 years away — docmilanfar · 2026-08-23
- Humanoid milestone: learning tasks without engineers — VraserX · 2026-08-23