GLM-5.3 Matches Fable 5 Coding Quality at 1/4th Cost
zainhas · x · 2026-08-23
DeepSWE benchmarks indicate that GLM-5.3 achieves coding quality parity with Fable 5 at a fraction of the cost. Key stats: GLM-5.3 scores 69.0% vs. Fable 5's 69.7%; cost per task is $3.99 vs. $21; token usage is 80k vs. 114k; and it manages 124 turns vs. 85. The data suggests open weights models are offering a significantly better price-performance ratio.
Related event: GLM-5.3 Matches Fable 5 on DeepSWE at a Quarter of the Cost(4 posts)→
More from Models
- Decision models match LLMs on routing and safety — and are 7-8x faster — randal_olson · 2026-10-16
- Xiaomi MiMo V2.6 Pro takes #1 open-model spot on Agent Arena at $0.11/task — arena · 2026-10-16
- ChatGPT's 'best AI video tool' answer points to Runway integration, sparking ad doubts — tlakomy · 2026-10-16
- Microsoft's MAI finishes in-house 3T-parameter pretrained base models, post-training results coming — soumitrashukla9 · 2026-10-16
- Hands-on with Gemini 4 Argon: faster than Opus 5.5 but hallucinates more and costs more — prasenx · 2026-10-16
- Bindu Reddy urges Meta to open-source Wonder, claiming it beats DeepSeek — bindureddy · 2026-10-16