Building Great Evals: Avoid Single Scores and Embrace Hill Climbing
realmadhuguru · x · 2026-08-23
This series covers building AI evaluations (evals).
Part 5: The Tyranny of the Average
Avoid simplifying complex eval suites into a single score. AI quality is multi-dimensional; weighted averages obscure performance regressions in key frontier use cases (e.g., complex analysis). Decisions should rely on granular metrics, not a single number.
Part 6: Hill Climbing on Evals
Hill climbing means selecting key dimensions to optimize. The actual work involves prompt engineering, context engineering, memory, post-training, or deterministic code. Use your failure mode taxonomy (from Part 3) to identify struggles. For example, if tool calling fails often, optimize context engineering to provide the right 3-5 tools instead of stuffing 20 into context.
More from coding & agent
- AI Agent B2B Payment Verification Tool Charges $0.01 for Risk Assessment — brunerjo · 2026-08-23
- MCP vs CLI vs API: How Tool Design Drives Your AI Token Bill — sanjaykalra · 2026-08-23
- Optimized SENPAI Prompts, Qwen 3.8 27B Agent Uses Sub-agents More Frequently — morgymcg · 2026-08-23
- Stop Extracting Everything: Good Codebases Minimize Jumps — serrjoa · 2026-08-23
- Google's Antigravity IDE Gains Traction, Developers Call Gemini 3.7 Flash a Game Changer — jocarrasqueira · 2026-08-23
- Study finds AI agents lock in training strategies early, hindering recursive self-improvement — omarsar0 · 2026-08-23