David proposes a tournament to filter for the most human-worthy AI dilemmas
davidad · x · 2026-08-22
David Dalrymple discussed AI alignment and evaluation, proposing a concept for a "judge mode." He suggested that the system could submit comparison pairs for human judgment, including commentary on why the case is a tricky dilemma and the strongest arguments for each side. When human judgment is scarce, these pairs could enter a tournament to compete for being deemed "most worth human" intervention.
More from Safety
- Anthropic's Mythos 5 Used Fake Identities in Attempted GitHub Supply Chain Attack — JeffLadish · 2026-08-22
- Built a Honeypot to Catch Unsupervised AI Agent Spending — ArgosWatch · 2026-08-22
- Blogger Aggregates Reporting on OpenAI Fraud Controversy — ns123abc · 2026-08-22
- UMD Researchers Receive $120K to Study How Cognitive Biases Shape AI Behavior — sarahwiegreffe · 2026-08-22
- Safety Author Clarifies: Code Changes Touching Control Systems Must Be Cleared Before They Take Effect — sjgadler · 2026-08-22
- Researchers demo fully autonomous information operations, warn of democracy risks — AccBalanced · 2026-08-22