AI can check technical correctness first; past that bar, evaluation is all that matters
Afinetheorem · x · 2026-08-21
The author argues step one should be "is this technically correct": code runs from raw data, proofs are formally accurate, citations say what they claim — things AI can already do. For papers passing that bar, the only thing left to care about is evaluation.
More from AGI Musings
- Developers are 'Vibe Coding' Bespoke Websites Using APIs Daily — moultano · 2026-08-22
- AI Superforecasters and the Future Value of Prediction Markets — devanshmehta · 2026-08-22
- Nick Bostrom on Using Imperfectly Aligned Weak SI to Build Aligned AGI — haider1 · 2026-08-22
- Next Economic Divide May Be Work vs. Ownership, Not Education — VraserX · 2026-08-22
- AI capex craze questioned: $10T annual revenue needed to justify spending — GaryMarcus · 2026-08-22
- Two Americas: NIMBYs vs. AI in Space — ai · 2026-08-22