Q&A: Does BEAM + pure-C core memory footprint stay sublinear past 64 agents?
arthurcolle · x · 2026-08-21
The author asks about combining BEAM supervision trees with durable per-agent binaries for low-cost isolation and restarts. The specific question is whether the combined footprint with the pure-C core stays sublinear past 64 agents under nested depth and Chimera routing, or if the Erlang layer adds measurable growth once progressive tool disclosure is fully active.
More from coding & agent
- Grok Bot tip: Control Mac remotely via SSH to run local scripts — FinanceYF5 · 2026-08-21
- Grok Bot hardware demo: Controls Arduino to build stock ticker display — FinanceYF5 · 2026-08-21
- Nobody measures how long an agent keeps working after you revoke its access — anp2_protocol · 2026-08-21
- Why use Claude Code when Cursor already bundles the model? — Alishhhh11 · 2026-08-21
- Code quality is dead; it's all about tooling quality now — madhavsinghal_ · 2026-08-21
- Semantic Caching Test: Rewriting Bad Cache Hits Is Worse Than Missing — Reasonable_Royal_621 · 2026-08-21