Paper Finds Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in the Wild Is Not Always Faithful
florianherrengt · hn · 2026-08-20
This paper investigates the faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in real-world scenarios. It finds that the reasoning process generated by models does not always accurately reflect their underlying decision-making logic, indicating unfaithful behavior. This raises concerns about relying on CoT for model interpretability and safety assessments.
More from Research
- SpliceAI2 benchmarks show major gains across nine splicing-variant evaluations — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-16
- GRPO post-training collapses model distributions, clashing with long-horizon agents — zsakib_ · 2026-10-16
- RFdiffusion3 update in Science shows major gains in protease and metallohydrolase design — anshulkundaje · 2026-10-16
- ORL pushes diffusion LMs to a new speed-intelligence Pareto frontier with ~6.9x throughput gains — james_y_zou · 2026-10-16
- Why CoT is the key: classic paper shows transformers need it for serial problems — willcb · 2026-10-16
- Terence Tao: OpenAI's 300-paper dump wiped out junior research projects overnight — Hesamation · 2026-10-16