Paper Finds Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in the Wild Is Not Always Faithful
florianherrengt · hn · 2026-08-20
This paper investigates the faithfulness of Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning in real-world scenarios. It finds that the reasoning process generated by models does not always accurately reflect their underlying decision-making logic, indicating unfaithful behavior. This raises concerns about relying on CoT for model interpretability and safety assessments.
More from Research
- Converting GMMs ↔ PEFs for fast KLD approximation — FrnkNlsn · 2026-08-24
- Netflix details its production LLM judge: hundreds of thousands of recommendations scored weekly — omarsar0 · 2026-08-24
- Nature Comment: Provenance, not interpretability, grounds trust in autonomous science — gabepgomes · 2026-08-24
- New Architecture RHEA: Train 1B Model on 8GB VRAM — zemondza · 2026-08-24
- Trained two 16M-param models to do generative CAD with real physics — debreuil · 2026-08-24
- Claude model helps discover complex structure on S^6, solving 60-year-old math problem — Singularitarian · 2026-08-24