Viral guide: professors should run Pangram AI-detection before tweeting
soumitrashukla9 · x · 2026-08-19
A user's tongue-in-cheek 'responsible guide for AI use on Twitter' is making the rounds: professors should at least run Pangram and verify >90% human before tweeting; the Dean of Harvard College, when called out with evidence of AI slop posting, should do the same; indie scholars and casual posters — 'nobody cares, have fun!'
The thread also drew Steven Strauss's quip 'I am so glad I am a nobody, and no one cares,' highlighting the credibility pressure public figures now face when posting in the AI era.
Related event: Satirical 'Responsible AI Guide' for Twitter Goes Viral(2 posts)→
More from Fun
- Muscle memory fail: Treating terminal like an LLM — fhinkel · 2026-08-20
- Pangram accused of false positive on fully human-written post, sparking X debate — LLMJunky · 2026-08-20
- Gemini 3.7 hallucinates on simple addition task — orange-catz · 2026-08-20
- New project uses drawings to teach friends about LLMs and Agents — floguo · 2026-08-20
- Qwen 3.8 27B locally builds a classic Tibia clone — EveningIncrease7579 · 2026-08-20
- Microsoft's failure taxonomy inspires "Bonnie and Claude" heist screenplay pitch — mhkeller · 2026-08-20