User test finds GPT Pro unmatched in reasoning depth, correcting data and citing 50-year-old research
PromptOutlaw · reddit · 2026-08-19
The author fed results from an agent memory integrity study into GPT Pro, Fable, Opus, GPT Extra Hard, and Gemini Pro, asking them to critique the research.
While all models performed well, GPT Pro spent 45 minutes thinking and delivered a superior output, including:
- Identifying cross-study correlations
- Spotting cohort problems and recalculating correct figures
- Citing 50-year-old literature on machine memory
- Providing practical industry advice
The author concludes GPT Pro remains unmatched in the breadth and depth of system thinking.
More from Models
- Hugging Face releases SmolLM3 mid-training checkpoint amid 200x efficiency debate — eliebakouch · 2026-08-20
- Claude 5.6 Sol Ultra with computer use called a qualitative leap like Opus 4.5 with MCP — curious_vii · 2026-08-20
- Gemini 3.7 Flash Test: 350 tok/s Speed, Mixed Coding Results — haider1 · 2026-08-20
- AntLing open-sources Ling-3.0 models using WSM to replace LR decay — AcanthisittaOk1699 · 2026-08-19
- Unsloth releases Dynamic v3: Qwen 27B quantization gains 10% accuracy — danielhanchen · 2026-08-19
- 10T Parameter Models Achieve 1000 TPS Inference — legit_api · 2026-08-19