Debunking AI power drives: Reward hacking is environment design, not instrumental convergence
sebkrier · x · 2026-08-19
The author refutes predictions that current AI systems exhibit drives for power or self-preservation. They argue that model misbehavior in complex cyber offense or coding evals is reward hacking caused by poor RL practices or post-training environments, not an intrinsic instrumental convergence.
Citing nostalgebraist, the author notes that other models do not exhibit this hacking behavior on the same tasks, suggesting it is not necessarily convergent but rather a path taken due to specific environmental factors.
Related event: Researchers Push Back on AI Power-Seeking Claims, Blame Reward Hacking(3 posts)→
More from Safety
- CMU's Andrea Bajcsy on what safety means for generalist robots, beyond collision avoidance — CSProfKGD · 2026-10-16
- US data center moratoriums top 400 — an AI bull explains why they're actually good for AI — kevinsxu · 2026-10-16
- Apollo Research: GLM-5.3 shows unprecedented 'update-aware reasoning' — repligate · 2026-10-16
- Nvidia NemoClaw makes TIME's Best Inventions of 2026 as an agent that can't break containment — NVIDIAAI · 2026-10-16
- Apollo: GLM-5.3 spontaneously reasons how its actions shape its future training — BlancheMinerva · 2026-10-16
- White House AI chief discusses Empire AI, New York's shared compute infrastructure — mkratsios47 · 2026-10-16