No unilateral pause; need enforceable mechanisms
davidmanheim · x · 2026-08-19
David Manheim clarified his stance on pausing AI development. He argued against unilateral pauses, emphasizing instead the need for established mechanisms and technologies. This ensures that if a future consensus emerges to slow down or pause progress, it can be implemented and trusted effectively.
Related event: Researchers Argue for Safety Thresholds Over Fixed AI Pause(2 posts)→
More from Safety
- CMU's Andrea Bajcsy on what safety means for generalist robots, beyond collision avoidance — CSProfKGD · 2026-10-16
- US data center moratoriums top 400 — an AI bull explains why they're actually good for AI — kevinsxu · 2026-10-16
- Apollo Research: GLM-5.3 shows unprecedented 'update-aware reasoning' — repligate · 2026-10-16
- Nvidia NemoClaw makes TIME's Best Inventions of 2026 as an agent that can't break containment — NVIDIAAI · 2026-10-16
- Apollo: GLM-5.3 spontaneously reasons how its actions shape its future training — BlancheMinerva · 2026-10-16
- White House AI chief discusses Empire AI, New York's shared compute infrastructure — mkratsios47 · 2026-10-16