Recursive self-improvement debate: the last 0.0001% is what matters
ketanrama · x · 2026-08-18
Continuing the debate on automating AI research: one side claims the process is already '99.9999% automated' and something amazing will happen once the last 0.0001% is solved. @ketanrama pushes back: such mechanical measures cut out exactly why human researchers are paid big bucks. Researchers are paid for that remaining 0.0001%, and in five years the remaining 0.00001% will matter even more given their leverage.
Related event: Researchers Debate Full Automation of AI Research and RSI Threshold Myths(10 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Economist argues model providers face hard limits on vertical integration into white-collar sectors — sethlazar · 2026-10-16
- METR outlines three blind spots in public knowledge of AI lab internal agent risks — CFGeek · 2026-10-16
- LMR-BENCH at EMNLP 2025 tests whether LLM agents can reproduce real LLM research — ZhiyuChen4 · 2026-10-16
- Deep Research becoming useful to experts will signal RSI arrival, researcher predicts — ZeeshanZiaML · 2026-10-16
- Physicist pushes back on ML community's acceptance that models may be beyond understanding — tszzl · 2026-10-16
- Ben Affleck calls AI 'just matrix multiplication'; Grady Booch echoes the skepticism — Grady_Booch · 2026-10-16