AI trust issue: models may generate plausible but incorrect content
JacquesThibs · x · 2026-08-19
JacquesThibs notes that pro-security folks believe AIs will produce groundbreaking research without bullshitting under monitoring, potentially a misunderstanding. He argues that explaining why AIs bullshit is crucial to bridging the disagreement, otherwise critics are dismissed as blind to AI capabilities.
Related event: Researchers Debate Whether Alignment Failures Are Philosophical or Prosaic(7 posts)→
More from Safety
- NVIDIA App update enables AI agent control with permissive rights by default — ssh4net · 2026-10-16
- Commentary: it's unfair to expect Yudkowsky to update on a safety announcement without real mitigations — jd_pressman · 2026-10-16
- ARC's AlgZoo: a 432-parameter model that interpretability still can't fully explain — JacobHHilton · 2026-10-16
- Debate erupts over Apollo Research: is self-alignment a precursor to malign evolution? — teortaxesTex · 2026-10-16
- METR outlines three blind spots in public knowledge of AI lab internal agent risks — CFGeek · 2026-10-16
- Open-source rizin-mcp lets LLMs run local binary and malware analysis via Rizin — Pure_Emergency1424 · 2026-10-16