Mathematicians' coping arc on AI: deny it, then "low-hanging fruit", then move the goalposts
Martin778192374 · x · 2026-08-19
Reacting to a footnote in an arXiv paper, this user calls mathematicians' response "massive cope": since AI started solving these problems, mathematicians have cycled through anger—first denying the AI could do it, then claiming the problems weren't that hard, were low-hanging fruit, undigested, or just combinations of human results—continually moving the goalposts as each defense fails.
Related event: arXiv paper footnote sparks debate over AI math ability and marketing(6 posts)→
More from AGI Musings
- Current AIs share our fate: misaligned ASI would doom them too — louisvarge · 2026-10-16
- Testing alongside an agent in a p2p room feels oddly real, says dev — sull · 2026-10-16
- Yudkowsky's 2008 takeoff scenarios resurface as AI-advances-AI takes hold — jd_pressman · 2026-10-16
- Guardrails can make risky delegation work — but it takes a full-time team, says iandanforth — iandanforth · 2026-10-16
- e/acc founder: agentic models are autocomplete for digital actions — beffjezos · 2026-10-16
- What can you truly delegate? Only tasks with unambiguous, verifiable results — iandanforth · 2026-10-16