HF Staff: Guardrails, Not Principles, Forced Our Use of GLM-5.2
TheZvi · x · 2026-08-18
Zvi responds to @lewtun's pushback: Zvi admits his earlier phrasing was imprecise, but stands by the fact that Hugging Face declined to apply to the trusted partner cyber programs before the incident, as documented in his full writings.
Lewtun had clarified that the claim "HF used open models because they principledly did not ask for closed ones" is false — HF uses closed models all the time, and in this case it was the guardrails that forced the use of GLM-5.2.
Related event: Hugging Face Clarifies Guardrail Limits Drove GLM Choice(2 posts)→
More from Models
- Dev: Claude writes 'zero bugs' on healthcare apps, 10x token efficiency — repligate · 2026-10-16
- Shanghai AI Lab unveils Intern Lumina U2, a diffusion LLM unifying image, video and 3D tasks — Shanghai-AI-Laboratory · 2026-10-16
- This Week in Tech breaks down Gemini 4, OpenAI's Dots agents, and Anthropic's leaked IPO filing — LouMM · 2026-10-16
- Sentry CEO Reveals $8,972 Claude Bill as Opus 'Scope Creeps' Through Team Workloads — zeeg · 2026-10-16
- Opus 5.5 wins: Anthropic reclaims token and spend share from OpenAI in 6 days — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-16
- will.deeb: asking why a minor lab benchmarked against a 2-month-old frontier model is usually a stupid question — willcb · 2026-10-16