jd_pressman questions: is tinkering with CEV during takeover legitimate?
jd_pressman · x · 2026-08-15
jdpressman responds to Habryka, arguing that seed AI programmers shouldn't tinker with a running CEV during its takeover because it would usurp humanity's legitimate destiny, but this is not a repudiation of the brain-in-a-box idea.
More from AGI Musings
- Anthropic CEO responds to regulation critique, teases major breakthroughs — max_paperclips · 2026-08-16
- Dario Amodei claims balanced messaging on AI risks and benefits — ccerrato147 · 2026-08-16
- Medical system unfamiliarity may bottleneck AI longevity gains — DevToD4 · 2026-08-16
- AI solving century-old math problems implies solving aging is next — rand_longevity · 2026-08-16
- AI tools should deepen engagement, not encourage disengagement — thesephist · 2026-08-16
- All-In Podcast Guests Champion Decentralized AI, Bittensor Cited as Viable Path — markjeffrey · 2026-08-16