MIRI's 2017 Strategy: Retaining Optionality on Alignment-Capabilities Insights

jessi_cata · x · 2026-08-16

jessicata cites MIRI's 2017 fundraiser and strategy update, noting that MIRI's strategy is closer to 'retaining optionality about which projects to help with our integrated alignment-capabilities insights on the task AGI / pivotal act path, which we pre-emptively keep secret' than 'we think <X org> should do a task AGI'. This responds to the debate about whether MIRI tried to take over the world, showing it retained optionality and secretly assisted.

Related event: Did MIRI Ever Aim to 'Take Over the World'? AI Safety Community Feuds Over FAI History and CEV(25 posts)→

Original post →

More from AGI Musings

AGI Musings channel →