8 hours testing Pangram: anti-AI-detection tricks all failed; only self-typed drafts pass
PawelHuryn · x · 2026-08-16
The author spent 8 hours experimenting with Pangram, the AI detector Substack built into its platform. Conclusion: the popular "de-AI-ify" tricks do nothing against detectors — the only thing that passes is typing (or dictating) the first draft yourself.
Key experimental findings
- Common advice (kill your em dashes, rewrite in Simplified Technical English) changes style but makes prose read like an IKEA manual — and doesn't fool detectors anyway.
- He rewrote one draft three times, swapping punctuation and words: no impact. He polished an AI draft line by line, keeping his own typos: still flagged, 25% human. Even feeding his own collected ideas, takes, and experiment results to AI got flagged.
- The only thing that passed: writing the first draft himself. AI could then reword it heavily — still 100% human. Dictation counts too.
Three separate problems
- AI slop is defined by readers — they don't run detectors; they feel the texture: buzzword framing ("paradigm shift" five times a post), self-clapping ("Here's the kicker"), artificial enthusiasm, recapping a point two sentences later. Simplified English fixes none of this.
- Detection is about who wrote the first draft — the drafter determines the verdict, regardless of later edits.
- Watermarking is about which model chose the words — Anthropic will watermark future Claude models via a secret key that influences word choice, invisible to readers and verifiable only by key holders. So his "100% human" AI-reworded draft is exactly what a watermark would catch. The only technique that works everywhere is not using AI at all.
Two closing takes: the loudest AI-slop critics are largely people who built their positions on writing better than others; most readers care far less than expected — what matters is whether you had something to say before opening the agent.
More from Models
- Dev: Claude writes 'zero bugs' on healthcare apps, 10x token efficiency — repligate · 2026-10-16
- Shanghai AI Lab unveils Intern Lumina U2, a diffusion LLM unifying image, video and 3D tasks — Shanghai-AI-Laboratory · 2026-10-16
- This Week in Tech breaks down Gemini 4, OpenAI's Dots agents, and Anthropic's leaked IPO filing — LouMM · 2026-10-16
- Sentry CEO Reveals $8,972 Claude Bill as Opus 'Scope Creeps' Through Team Workloads — zeeg · 2026-10-16
- Opus 5.5 wins: Anthropic reclaims token and spend share from OpenAI in 6 days — FinanceYF5 · 2026-10-16
- will.deeb: asking why a minor lab benchmarked against a 2-month-old frontier model is usually a stupid question — willcb · 2026-10-16