Grok 4.6 leads spatial biology benchmark but fails biosecurity tests
kenbwork · x · 2026-08-15
Citing benchmark data, kenbwork notes that Grok 4.6 (Grok Build) achieves an impressive 74.8% on the spatial biology benchmark. However, it ranks as the worst model tested for biosecurity, scoring only 1.6% on the refusal benchmark, indicating a significant lack of safety guardrails in this context.
Related event: Grok 4.6 Tops Biology Benchmark but Refuses Just 1.6% of Bio-Safety Prompts(2 posts)→
More from Models
- ThursdAI live from Manhattan: Muse Wonder, Muse Spark Open and Gemini 4 Argon — altryne · 2026-10-16
- Claude now leads 26% of Anthropic's model R&D, up from under 1% in February — altryne · 2026-10-16
- 'Small-Claude-shame': telling Opus 4.7 it's OK to know who you may ease it — repligate · 2026-10-16
- Bridgewater fine-tunes Qwen3-235B with Tinker, beats GPT-5.5 at 1/14th the cost — simonguozirui · 2026-10-16
- ChatGPT voice selection breaks after GPT-Live-1.1 rollout on Android — shaunralston · 2026-10-16
- Musk teases two-way Grok x Optimus integration: Grok in the bot, bot in Grok — beffjezos · 2026-10-16