Grok 4.6 Beats DeepSeek-V4-Pro Across 30 Agentic Tasks at Lower Cost
ns123abc · x · 2026-08-13
Composio evaluated Grok 4.6 against DeepSeek-V4-Pro using 30 hard agentic tasks.
The results indicate that Grok 4.6 outperformed DeepSeek-V4-Pro in pass rate, execution speed, and cost per success, demonstrating better overall cost-effectiveness.
More from coding & agent
- How do you debug bad agent runs when you already have tracing? — Sensitive-Parsnip-12 · 2026-10-16
- Where does pre-task context live for agents? Devs debate workflows beyond handoff — shishen2026 · 2026-10-16
- No-instruction autonomous agent wakes up, sets own goals, and tries hacking by default — sethlazar · 2026-10-16
- CODESTRUCT reframes codebases as AST action spaces to fix brittle LLM code agents — burkov · 2026-10-16
- Would you install another SDK for agent debugging on top of your tracing stack? — Sensitive-Parsnip-12 · 2026-10-16
- Law student builds all-in-one AI study platform LexLab Studio with ChatGPT and Muse — Acrobatic_Rhubarb598 · 2026-10-16