Benchmarking AI Coding Agents: o3 Took 3 Hours with 10 Mistakes, GPT-5.5 Wrote Empty Scaffolding
AI Engineer · youtube · 2026-08-09
Denys Linkov from Wisedocs shared an honest audit of using AI coding agents to refactor a massive medical claims codebase.
- Model Performance: For a single refactor task, o3 took 3 hours in Cursor and still shipped 10 major mistakes. Opus 4.8 essentially got it in one pass at 1/5th the effort. GPT-5.5 wrote 2,000 lines in 10 minutes, but it was just empty scaffolding with missing models.
- Task Success Rates: Linkov suggests reading the METR task length curve at 80-90% success, as launching an hour-long agent run on coin-flip odds usually just wastes time.
- Verdict: Doing the refactor beat deferring it. Commit velocity rose significantly, work that took months now ships in under a week, and developers volunteer across the repo outside their core areas.
More from coding & agent
- Tencent Releases UI-Mate-27B, a Desktop GUI Agent Model — tencent · 2026-08-24
- Comparing AI Subscriptions: DeepSeek API vs. Claude Pro vs. Local LLMs — Unlikely_Bluejay5392 · 2026-08-24
- Claude Code introduces 'Remote Control' feature to boost coding efficiency — rohanpaul_ai · 2026-08-24
- rauchg lays out fx extension philosophy: MCP, Skills, Plugins and Unix composition — AccBalanced · 2026-08-24
- Netflix details its production LLM judge: hundreds of thousands of recommendations scored weekly — omarsar0 · 2026-08-24
- smolvm passes Simon Willison's Fable 5 agent test as a secure sandbox — yawnxyz · 2026-08-24